6/24/2023 0 Comments Auditory processing disorder test![]() Emanuel indicated that this may be due to the lack of supporting literature for the tests (most audiologists used the SCAN-C, which comes with a manual). Emanuel (2002) found that none of the 192 responding audiologists followed the recommended minimum (C)AP test battery outlined in a Bruton conference in 2000 (Jerger & Musiek, 2000). This is valuable information because audiologists seem to have some trepidation when considering and performing (C)AP evaluations. The purpose of this document was to update and augment the 1996 ASHA position statement and to help guide audiologists in the diagnosis (i.e., selecting the necessary tools to accurately perform (C)AP evaluations) and intervention (i.e., selecting the type of therapy) of (C)APD. In 2005, the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) approved its working group document on (C)AP (ASHA, 2005). This article will discuss information from that document, as well as provide clinical examples to elaborate upon it. Nearly a decade later, ASHA updated that statement with a working group document that contains recommendations to guide audiologists in assessing children for (C)APD. In 1996, the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) wrote a consensus statement on central auditory processing, or (C)AP (ASHA, 1996). ![]() Additionally, it is difficult for audiologists to start this testing in their clinics, because no single test battery has been identified as being the gold standard. ![]() Surveys indicate that audiologists' knowledge and skills in this area are lacking. The assessment of (central) auditory processing disorders, (C)APDS, is an aspect of audiology with which many clinicians seem to struggle, especially when working with children.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |